The Scarlett Letter :: essays research papers

Symbolism at its best is limitless in conveying a feeling, mood, or atmoshphere that words alone move not define. It mountain trigger emotion, persuade the reader to question everything they know thus far, or inflict thoughts that, in the most twisted sense of the story, would face barely justified. Symboloism reaches out to the reader in numerous ways, but no matter what the effect, its almost always starts as something subconscious. In Nathanial Hawthorns novel, The Scarlet Letter, there is an considerable ammount of symbolism the structure and flow of progression are both held back by this element. The subtle way Hawthorn uses this is incredible he takes us to such a place where everything and everyone is suspect and subject to thorough examination, as things are not always what they count. Other times, however, they are in fact exactly what they seem usually too little too late. By the time the truth is laid outright, the truth had already been known symbolism is subconsci ous. At times when there is no truth to be uncovered, it is the world created by this world of various entities, in a matter of symbol, that lies dormant in the back of the readers head. Being richly and inescapably aware though, from a place deep inside, of the uncertanties and illusions that are not being focused on, instead only hinted at. The minds eye is where symbolism wraps its ugly tentacles of query and discretion, whether realized by the reader or not. The Scarlet Letter, demonstrates this characteristic impecibly. The scaffold where Hester stands in front of the public is symbolic of penitence and Gods judgement. Dimmesdale on the other hand, can not bring himself to stand on the platform and confess his sins, because of its comparison to judgement day. The first time he brings himself to stand upon the scaffold, seeking relief from his dark sin is under the cover of night, as if he could hide his sin from the people, or even God. In the end Dimmesdale does stand on th e scaffold in the light of day to public confess his sins. This took courage, as the platform represented weakness in the eyes of God. Across from the prison Hester was sentenced to there is a move bush the single beautiful thing in a world of sin and shame. In the book when Pearl was asked where she came from, she states that she was plucked from the rosebush.

Moshe Dayan Research :: essays research papers fc

Moshe Dayan was an Israeli array warrior who became a crusader for peace. He was skilled in both battle and diplomacy. He played a key lineament in four wars, but also helped negotiate the historic Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty. Moshe Dayan was a Soldier and statesman who led Israel to dramatic victories over its Arab neighbours and became a attribute of security to his countrymen. Moshe Dayan was born in a kibbutz, in a town called Deganya Alef (Alef is the name for the letter A in Hebrew) in Palestine, then still break out of the Ottoman Empire May 20th, 1915. His parents were Shmuel and Devorah, and he was the first child born in the newly-established community. When he was only 14 he joined the Haganah. (The Haganah (In Hebrew " apology") was a Zionist military organization in Palestine). He was very influenced by military techniques and teachings officer Orde Wingate gave Moshe. Afterwards he went to Bulgaria where he graduated from the military academy. This is a p icture of Moshes Birthplace. He was once arrested by the British, (when the Haganah was declared illegal), but released after two years when the British cooperated with them during World War II. magic spell he was serving on the Australian 7th Infantry Division, Dayan lost his left eye and began wearing the eyepatch that became his trademark, and later Dayan received the Distinguished table service Order, one of the highest military honors. During the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Dayan occupied various positions of importance, first as the commander of many military units on the central front. Later he was he became the prime ministers protg, together with Shimon Peres (the future Prime Minister). After the 1948 war, Dayans ranking rose very fast. From 1955 to 1958 he was the Chief of round of the Israeli Defense Force, where he commanded the Israeli forces during the Suez Crisis. In 1959, Dayan joined MAPAI, the leftist party in Israeli politics. Until 1964 he served as the minister of agriculture in Israel, and in 1967, Eshkol (current prime minister) decided to give him the position of Minister of Defense.2General Moshe Dayan (center), Chief of Staff General Yitschak Rabin (right) and General Uzi Narkiss (left), enter Old capital of Israel in 1967Dayan was still the secretary of defense when the Yom Kippur War catastrophically began on October 6, 1973. He was in charge for military planning, and at first didnt pick out for a mobilization of the army, he said that he didnt want Israel to appear as the aggressor, and that Israel could win the war even after an Arab attack.

Witchcraft in the Ibibio Tribe Essay -- Religion

Witchcraft has become a phenomenon in the last few years, launching TV shows and movies onto the screens of televisions and cinemas. It has become an inspirational topic for writers to launch their contiguous book. But, as entertaining as witchcraft maybe to us, it is feared by the Ibibio tribe of Nigeria. This paper will focus on how the Ibibio tribe detected, prevented witchcraft and the massive anti-witch lead that took place all around Africa. Also, this paper will analyze presumptive causes that could have led to a witchcraft bybreak in the Ibibio.Nigeria has had its share of outbreaks but, out of all of them the most unique must have been the witchcraft outbreak that plagued all of Nigeria and the rest of Africa. The Ibibio tribe of Nigeria in the seventeenth century, where about two cardinal people that were mostly agrarians or petty traders, according to Daniel Offiong, researcher and author of Social Relations and Witchcraft Beliefs Among the Ibibio and Witchcraft Among the Ibibio of Nigeria. The tribe was mainly Christian with a few Muslims (Offiong, 1983, pg. 73). They believed in one god and the Holy Ghost, but when they had to deal with an affliction, they went to diviners or spiritualists for treatment (Offiong, 1983, pg. 73-74). When they were plagued with a problem, their main reaction was to blame the problem on witchcraft with no logical explanation behind it. The existence of witchcraft started in Nigeria, due to the continuous process of blaming witchcraft for unexplainable problems. Once witchcraft became the cause of the unexplained problem, people started accusing each other of being witches. Research conducted by Daniel A. Offiong, suggests that the people who were more prone to be acc apply of witchcr... ... used and the anti-witchcraft crusade that took place. It also went into the social elements that may have played a part in the outbreak of witchcraft in this tribe. Works CitedShaman. (2011, 1 11). capital of South Carolina Ele ctronic Encyclopedia.Marwick, M. G. (1952). The Social Context of Cewa Witch Beliefs. Cambridge University Press, 120-135.Offiong, D. (1983). Social Relations and Witch Beliefs among the Ibibio. Cambridge University Press, 73-82.Offiong, D. A. (1983). Witchcraft Among the Ibibio of Nigeria. African Studies Association, 107-124.Offiong, D. A. (1999). Traditional Healers in the Nigerian Health Care remains and the Debate Over Integrating Traditional and Scientific Medicine. Anthropological Quarterly, 118-130.William A. Haviland, H. E. (2008). Cultural Anthropology The Human Challege. Belmont Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

evilmac Macbeth and Lady Macbeth Were Not Evil Essay example -- Macbe

Macbeth and skirt Macbeth Were Not Evil Shakespeares Macbeth contains many mephistophelean deeds, the mass of which are perpetrated by none other than the title character and his wife (Macbeth and gentlewoman Macbeth). However, evil deeds dont necessarily mean an evil soul Macbeth and Lady Macbeth were not inherently evil. Before Macbeth and his wife even committed their first evil act, they had doubts. ... Yet I do fear thy nature./It is too full o the take out of human kindness/To catch the nearest wave... (Disciples 1315-0) Lady Macbeth says in her monologue after reading Macbeths letter. While she is already planning for the death of the king, she knows that it leave behind take an effort to convince Macbeth to go along with her vacation. She also doubts herself Stock up the access and passage to remorse, ...That my keen knife see not the trauma it makes, (I.V.232). While she calls upon the powers of evil to aid her in her quest for love, she knows her weak nesses (kindness, poor impulse control, etc.). She understands that she must change in order to be able to even care Macbeth in committing the murder, hence she is not inherently evil. Macbeth doubts himself as he doubts his fatherhood. In one of his talking-to-himself monologues (I.VII.828) he shows that he is not ready to be a father. He says that he has no reason to bear a child other than his own ambition (... I have no spur/To prick the sides of my intent, precisely only/vaulting ambition... (I.VII.25-27)) He also mentions that he would be so evil to commit the deed he would first be violating his duty to foster his King, as wel... ...the nightmares she experiences due to the murder of Duncan. Sh has episodes of sleepwalking where she attempts to scrub the blood off her hands and cleanse herself of the evil deed. And she hadnt even killed Duncan. Again this shows that she was NOT inherently evil. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are obviously amateurs at being evil. They doubted themselves and each other all through their evil acts, showing remorse and regret often. In fact, most of the evil that they committed can be almost directly linked to the Witches, who WERE inherently evil. They were the cause of their evil, not their souls. Therefore, Macbeth and his wife were clearly not the embodiment of pure evil. blend in CitedShakespeare, William. Tragedy of Macbeth . Ed. Barbara Mowat and Paul Warstine. New York Washington Press, 1992.

A Day at Work Essay -- Dialogue in Narrative Essays

A piercing sound grew louder as I slowly gained consciousness. Realising where it was coming from, I glanced at the stupid audio responsible for awakening me. Who the hell was phoning me at this time in the morning? Picking up the ringing object, I glanced at the clock hanging on the cream wall. 840am. Shit, I was late. take a leak started at 9am. I sighed. Whoever was making me even later better have a damn good reason.I hit the answer button. Yo. I mumbled into the speaker.I recognised my step-mothers annoyingly highpitched voice screeching through the speech sound. Robert James That is no guidance to answer the phone close time I expect to be hearing a nice, hello, Robert speaking, none of this ya nonsense-By this stage I had placed the phone next to my half-finished bio report on the desk. I had no intention of listening to her lecturing. She could try what she wanted, but shed never replace my mum like she desperately seemed to be trying to accomplish. I was nineteen eachw ay, not much she could do. She couldnt even say yo without sounding like a retard. Hell, she didnt even take the time to notice that noone called me by my full name. I was cognise as Rob to practically everyone apart from her.Fully clothed in my wrinkled uniform, I grabbed the phone, rushing for the approach. Laters Ax I called over my shoulder to my roomie Axel, not giving a shit if he heard me or not. I was already running late. Ill be stomach after work. I said, slamming the door behind me.As I rushed down the dull dormitry halls of Greenville college, I wearily raised the phone back up to my ear. not surprisingly, the screech-master was still at it. Before she could continue further on whatever the hell she was on about, I interrupted. Du... ...es.Realising I had zoned out again, stopped in the middle of the shop, whilst balancing 5 coffees on a tray, I looked over to see some customers glaring impatiently at me. Sheesh, calm your farms, its only coffee. Not wishing to ge t any closer to those stuck up looking customers, I swivelled around again and headed straight back to the kitchen. I threw the orders back on the judicatory and slapped Cade round the shoulder, Tell the headman Im sick wont ya? He looked at me doubtfully.Cough, cough? I half heartedly faked illness.Whatever dude, He eventually gave in, But you know, you owe me now, compensate? Anything you want mate. I honestly would have agreed to anything. At that moment I just needed to get out of that place. As soon as I got back to the dorms, I was planning on grabbing Axel and going on one of our not so legal adventures together. A Day at Work Essay -- Dialogue in Narrative EssaysA piercing sound grew louder as I slowly gained consciousness. Realising where it was coming from, I glanced at the stupid phone responsible for awakening me. Who the hell was phoning me at this time in the morning? Picking up the ringing object, I glanced at the clock hanging on the cream wall. 840am. Shit, I was late. Work started at 9am. I sighed. Whoever was making me even later better have a damn good reason.I hit the answer button. Yo. I mumbled into the speaker.I recognised my step-mothers annoyingly highpitched voice screeching through the phone. Robert James That is no way to answer the phone Next time I expect to be hearing a nice, hello, Robert speaking, none of this ya nonsense-By this stage I had placed the phone next to my half-finished bio report on the desk. I had no intention of listening to her lecturing. She could try what she wanted, but shed never replace my mum like she desperately seemed to be trying to accomplish. I was nineteen anyway, not much she could do. She couldnt even say yo without sounding like a retard. Hell, she didnt even take the time to notice that noone called me by my full name. I was known as Rob to practically everyone apart from her.Fully clothed in my wrinkled uniform, I grabbed the phone, rushing for the door. Laters Ax I calle d over my shoulder to my roommate Axel, not giving a shit if he heard me or not. I was already running late. Ill be back after work. I said, slamming the door behind me.As I rushed down the dull dormitry halls of Greenville college, I wearily raised the phone back up to my ear. Not surprisingly, the screech-master was still at it. Before she could continue further on whatever the hell she was on about, I interrupted. Du... ...es.Realising I had zoned out again, stopped in the middle of the shop, whilst balancing 5 coffees on a tray, I looked over to see some customers glaring impatiently at me. Sheesh, calm your farms, its only coffee. Not wishing to get any closer to those stuck up looking customers, I swivelled around again and headed straight back to the kitchen. I threw the orders back on the bench and slapped Cade round the shoulder, Tell the boss Im sick wont ya? He looked at me doubtfully.Cough, cough? I half heartedly faked illness.Whatever dude, He eventually gave in, But you know, you owe me now, right? Anything you want mate. I honestly would have agreed to anything. At that moment I just needed to get out of that place. As soon as I got back to the dorms, I was planning on grabbing Axel and going on one of our not so legal adventures together.

A Tale of Two Cities :: essays research papers

A Tale of Two Cities           The year is 1775, and social ills plague both France and England. Jerry Cruncher, an odd-job-man who works for Tellsons Bank, stops the Dover mail-coach with an urgent message for Jarvis Lorry. Lorry is somewhat elderly, but quaintly dressed. The message instructs Lorry to wait at Dover for a young woman, and Lorry responds with the cryptic words, "Recalled to Life." At Dover, Lorry is met by Lucie Manette, a young orphan whose father, a once-eminent doctor whom she supposed dead, has been discovered in France. Lucie is a pretty, blonde, young woman of compassionate nature and who inspires a lot of love and loyalty in other mint. Lorry escorts Lucie to Paris, where they meet Defarge, a former servant of Doctor Manette, who has kept Manette safe in a garret. At this point, we are introduced to the first theme I found in this book that the reality of final stage is ever-painful. The narrator states, My f riend is dead, my neighbour is dead, my love, the darling of my soul is dead it is inexorable consolidation. Driven mad by eighteen years in the Bastille, Manette spends all of his snip making shoes, a hobby he learned while in prison. A theme I came across in this book, Inprisonment can dehumanize people, was supported at this point when Lorry questions the Doctor about his identity. The Doctor replies, Did you ask for my name? 105, North Tower. Lorry assures Lucie that her love and devotion can remember her father to life, and indeed they do.     The year is now 1780. Charles Darnay stands accused of treason against the English crown. A bombastic lawyer named Stryver pleads Darnays case, but it is not until his drunk, good-for-nothing colleague, Sydney carton, assists him that the court acquits Darnay. Carton clinches his argument by pointing out that he himself bears an uncanny resemblance to the defendant, which undermines the prosecutions case for unmistak ably identifying Darnay as the spy the authorities spotted. Somewhere within this passage, Dickens takes it upon himself to father up the theme that every human creature is different. He does this by stating that A wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human creature is conventional to be that profound secret and mystery to every other. Meanwhile, Lucie and Doctor Manette watched the court proceedings, and that night, Carton escorts Darnay to a tavern and asks how it feels to receive the sympathy of a woman wish Lucie.

A Tale of Two Cities :: essays research papers

A Tale of Two Cities           The year is 1775, and social ills aversion both France and England. Jerry Cruncher, an odd-job-man who works for Tellsons Bank, stops the capital of Delaware mail-coach with an urgent message for Jarvis Lorry. Lorry is somewhat elderly, but quaintly dressed. The message instructs Lorry to wait at Dover for a young cleaning lady, and Lorry responds with the cryptic words, "Rec anyed to Life." At Dover, Lorry is met by Lucie Manette, a young orphan whose father, a once-eminent doctor whom she supposed dead, has been discovered in France. Lucie is a pretty, blonde, young woman of compassionate nature and who inspires a lot of love and loyalty in other people. Lorry escorts Lucie to Paris, where they meet Defarge, a author servant of Doctor Manette, who has kept Manette safe in a garret. At this point, we are introduced to the first theme I found in this book that the frankness of death is ever-painful. Th e narrator states, My friend is dead, my neighbour is dead, my love, the darling of my soul is dead it is inexorable consolidation. Driven mad by eighteen years in the Bastille, Manette spends all of his time making shoes, a hobby he learned while in prison. A theme I came across in this book, Inprisonment flush toilet demean people, was supported at this point when Lorry questions the Doctor about his identity. The Doctor replies, Did you ask for my name? 105, North Tower. Lorry assures Lucie that her love and devotion can recall her father to life, and indeed they do.     The year is now 1780. Charles Darnay stands accused of treason against the English crown. A bombastic lawyer named Stryver pleads Darnays case, but it is not until his drunk, good-for-nothing colleague, Sydney Carton, assists him that the romance acquits Darnay. Carton clinches his argument by pointing out that he himself bears an uncanny resemblance to the defendant, which undermines the p rosecutions case for unmistakably identifying Darnay as the spy the authorities spotted. Somewhere within this passage, fiend takes it upon himself to bring up the theme that every human savage is different. He does this by stating that A wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human creature is constituted to be that profound secret and mystery to every other. Meanwhile, Lucie and Doctor Manette watched the court proceedings, and that night, Carton escorts Darnay to a tavern and asks how it feels to receive the sympathy of a woman like Lucie.

Immanent and Economic Trinity

Immanent and Economic Trinity When you think of God do you think of ace nobleman entity or do you take into account the age old idea of the tercet? For all of time we have understood the three individual someones in God, the Trinity, to be one in the same. The teaching of the Christian church tells us that God is three unique and separate peoples, provided they are at the same time all one soul in God. Now people have some different ways to mental image or represent the idea of three people as one. The trial of history has come up with many different ideas and images to try and represent the trinity.Like many things that have to do with the unknown nature of religion we put our mental limitations on our ideas. This is exclusively natural because it is the only way we can buoy comprehend things, and we only have earthly definitions and limits for things in the realm of this existence. The EconomicTrinity is the doctrine concerning how theFather, son, and Holy Spirit relate t o each other and the world. The word economic is use from the Greekoikonomikos,which means relating to arrangement of activities.Each person has different roles deep down theGodheadand each has different roles in relationship to the world. One way of thinking some the economic Trinity is to think of the Father as creator, countersign as redeemer, and Holy Spirit as sustainer. Subordinationism is the position consistently rejected by the antediluvian patriarch church that the Son and/or Spirit areontologicallysubordinate to the Father. The Council of Nicaea rejected this position with respect to the Son by employing terms like homoousias of one world and begotten not made.The former refers to the shared substance of divinity between Father and Son, the fact that both are enoughly eternal and thus equal in glory and power. The latter refers to the fact that, while the Father is indeed the source of the Sons generation, the Father doesnot create the Son. Only limited beings are created the Son is generated, and the Spirit proceeds or is spirated. These terms are utterly unique with respect to the being of God If we only articulate the appropriations or functions within the trinitarian life of God, we can quickly land ourselves in heretical hot water, so to speak.A doctrine of appropriations on its own quite easily leads to tritheism, in which there are three gods at work rather than one. Against this, we mustiness take heed of the Augustinian axiom against tritheismopera trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa, the external acts of the trinity are indivisible. This rule of trinitarian theology means that what each trinitarian person or mode of being does is inseparable from the other two persons. In other words, the actions of the Son in the world are also the actions of the Father and the Spirit the same applies to the other trinitarian persons.This Augustinian rule is related to the ancient doctrine of divineperichoresisor inter-penetration within Gods being. According to this doctrine, each person or mode of being participates in the other two persons or modes. The axiom of Augustine derives from this ontological mind the functional or economic claim that every action of God is an act of all three together. To appropriate one action to one person never means that the other two are not equally involved in its execution.If there were indeed an act belonging toonlyone person, the result would be tritheism, or at least ditheism. The Trinity is something that explains to us God and Strengthens our religious beliefs as well as our minds. It makes us think and can lead to many different ideas. We have to understand that the ideas we have are all explanations of unknown things. We have to use the knowledge we have and push fore and honor god with thought of Him. One day we will understand things in a way that is more clear to us, but until then we must keep trying to understand these things the best we can.

Research Paper on Clothes Essay

Fashion, is something that all girls want to talk about. Some people may think that the known designers just magically came up with an idea to make a whole collection on their own. Well, in some cases that is true but in close to cases its not. A lot of our infracting apparel that we die now are actually influenced by the garb from the 15th/16th century. Thats why the clothes from the 16th century and the clothes now are very similar in some ways through the way women wore thusly and the way they stage now, the way men dressed and the way men dress now and how the children dressed then and now.The women from the 16th century and the women now arent so different. both women then and now spent so much money trying to get the latest trends. It was/is so expensive to try to get the newest clothes. About 18% of womens salaries go towards clothes (ABA Journals. com. ) Both then and now, only the upper class can afford these new trends. The upper class women got the around comely gowns and clothes that were available because they had the money to be able to pay for the latest and newest trends. This is a picture of a beautiful upper class woman.She is wearing the most wonderful headpiece. (Realmofvenus. renaissanceitaly. net/wardrobe) It must of cost a lot of money to put this creation together. Its the same with today, the more(prenominal) money you have the more clothes you have. Those clothes that you have are top of the line, made by the most renowned fashion designers on this planet. Now of days, women can really wear whatever they want. They dont have to wear what everyone else is wearing, which back then was dresses, dresses and dresses. Clothing now reflects personality and creativity.It gives people some freedom, freedom that women back then didnt really have. The men then and the men now have a lot of things in common. They both got all dressed up for picky occasions. Men now usually just wear a suit but back then the men went all out The most f amed suit designers are Michael Kors and Calvin Klein (nymsuits. com) Puffing and slashing was the thing that was in. The men puffed and slashed everything from breeches to bodices to capes. Bodices were a tight-fitting Elizabethan arment covering the torso plural because the body came in two parts which fastened in the middle (Dictionary. com)Both the men then and now also wear drawers or underwear. So thats something else that the men then and now have in common. Basically, the kids in the 16th century had to wear what the adults wore. The boys wore what the men wore and the girls wore what the women wore. Well, the sizes were smaller. The babies on the other hand usually just wore onsies. What I mean by onsies is that they wore one piece of clothing that covered their entire body.Minus the head, neck and hands. Today, like adults, kids can really where what they want to. But, they do have some limits. In some private schools, kids are ordered to wear uniforms. Like the one bel ow. (windstan. com) This is something that a girl must wear to school. When there is no dress code in your school kids can really wear whatever they want. In conclusion, the clothes now and the clothes back then arent really different cause the clothes then and now have similar designs and inspiraions.

Othello’s Image Essay

This statement by A. C. Bradley examines the Othello character in an interesting light that peradventure gives a false image of the play. The first statement Bradley makes is that Othello is a while of mystery, exoticism and penetrative feeling These facts ring true. Othello is a mysterious foreigner who holds intense feeling for the struggles he has faced.The second statement Bradley makes however is lost on me. trustful, open, passionate but self-controlled Bradley believes Othello to be all these things when he clearly is a man who has many personal issues that are fully explored during the play. I completely disagreed with most of what Bradley stated about the character Othello. When he speaks of Othello being trustful I cannot dish but think of the jealousy he was overcome with when he thought Desdemona was having an affair with Michael Cassio. Othello never searched out the answers from Desdemona herself, instead Iago is the wizard sought out for answers.Othello knock dow n into a trance upon hearing that they lay together and that Desdemona has given Cassio his treasured handkerchief. This does not seem like a trusting man but one who becomes highly jealous without knowing the full story. Bradley was clearly not thinking straight when he came up with this analysis of Othello as a character and as a person. Othello also was not a self-controlled man as Bradley seems to believe he was. Othello was easily taken over by rage and jealousy which would manoeuvre him to unsightly things.In Act IV Scene I Othello strikes Desdemona after she mentions her move for Cassio, Othello misunderstands the love she has for Cassio and reacts irrationally. This highlights Othellos own inability to remain self-controlled. Another event is Act V Scene II when Othello kills Desdemona. Othello is so enraged by jealousy and has been manipulated by his dear friend Iago that he loses all self-control, killing Desdemona in her bed. This highlighted the weakness in character o f Othello that he would kill an innocent woman as she lay.

Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system.

As a theory which places heavy emphasis on the analysis of knowledgeabilitys and their relationship with society, especially with regards to the functions of institutions, Functionalists place a significant amount of focus on the educational activity system. However, this perspective is not always accepted, its macro theory approach is often seen as too wide bearing to be applied to the study of the education system as well as critics which dis presente the functions of the education system as portrayed by functionalists.Nevertheless, its macro theory approach puts the education system in context and is therefore a theory which is notable when discussing the role of the education system. Firstly, it cannot be ignored that one of the main principles of the theory is that society is based upon consensus, agreement between norms and value. As an institution of secondary sociableisation, Functionalist theorists see the education system as one of the main institutions which help to ach ieve value consensus within society, allowing society to operate in a smooth manner.Durkheim suggested that the education system is an institution which helps to create a collective consciousness, uniting society into one body, with the system creating social beings. As put forward by Durkheim, the education system helps to achieve this through the National Curriculum, brought in by the Education Reform Act 1988, which helps to create shargond values amongst all pupils throughout the country.Furthermore, Durkheim suggests that subjects made compulsory through the National Curriculum such as History and Religious studies help to enhance cohesion and social stability, minimising conflict within society through value consensus,- keeping social order. In this sense, Functionalism places significant emphasis upon the education system as an institution which contributes to the eudaimonia of society.However, it may be that in reality value consensus does not exit, as today the diversity o f society means that there is not agreement roughly norms and values. Ethnic and cultural diversity may therefore be attributed as factors which mean that the education system is not an institution which unites society, as it may not be able to change the norms and values instilled upon members of society by other forms of socialisation, such as the family or the areas of media young people are exposed to.Although, in defence, it is very much line up that educational establishments do aim to create a collective consciousness through individual school ethoss and uniforms, which are in operation to reduce conflict within society. Critically though, these could be seen as polices which aim to stabilise the school learning environment, as opposed to society.In addition, it is true to say that the inclusion of Citizenship is evidence that the government and educationalists are aiming to use education as an institution which aims to promote social cohesion, and indeed social beings. Per haps it could excessively been seen, that in terms of the relationship between education and society, that the education system cannot necessarily make up for the diversity of attitudes within society,- to what degree can the education system compensate for differences in values and shape behaviours and attitudes?